Another athlete proud of her body

Alex Morgan is also proud of her teammates' bodies.
And that is why she joined the cadre of other female athletes in proudly showing off her body in a photo shoot.
This is Morgan in a photo USWNT:
And this is a preview of Morgan from the photo shoot she did for the SI Swimsuit Issue.


That's not a bikini, by the way. It's paint.

OK. That is all.

Comments

Anonymous said…
At least Wambach & Sundage have a pinup for their lockers now
February 15, 2012 4:08 PM
ken said…
BBrothers, is that you again??
February 16, 2012 11:13 AM
Anonymous said…
No, but I was totally thinking about posting it and adding you and your girlfriend / wife whatever to the list of grateful recipients. You rock that deal.

Congrats to the Anonymous first poster. Trust me when I say that if I had been first I'd claim it. Seems you have more than one reader. Go Figure.

You got me bounced from WTS with your feminist whining. Nice job. We'll see if you can handle it here. Probably too much First Amendment for you.

Time to Woman Up. All the sisters are watching.
February 16, 2012 8:04 PM
Anonymous said…
Ah yes, the reduction of a complex issue to sexual gazes and the assumption that naked (or nearly naked) photos provide proper titillation for all involved. Can we instead think about how these images are indicative of an era when "sex sells" seems to rule the day and when the WPS can't seem to get its act together?

Or (going way off topic) even perhaps the myriad ways in which her "swimsuit," despite its pinks and purples, overwhelmingly looks like the good ole red white and blue... leading us to the ongoing disproportionate effects that this War on Terror has had on women's bodies both "at home" and "far away"?
February 17, 2012 12:29 PM
Anonymous said…
Seriously? Save illogical rants like this for your Gender Studies classes. Thanks for proving up how out of touch with reality you and your friends are.

B
February 19, 2012 12:41 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why trans athletes?

In a continuation of my last post in which I crib from GLAD lawyer Jennifer Levi's thoughtful social media posts, I offer here an explanation of why and how trans athletes became the target of the right. First, I keep seeing left of center posts/headlines/discourse that highlight how few trans girls/women are competing in sports. I don't love this framing. The underlying premise of inclusion and access does not have a tipping point.  Perhaps what it is meant to show is how the right is weaponizing this issue. This is both reasonable and true but not really very profound in its assessment. Look at some of the groups and people doing the work of banning trans athletes and you will also see agendas which are racist, and anti-Semitic, and Islamophobic, and anti-LGB as well.  If I have not already recommended Judith Butler's Who's Afraid of Gender? (though I am pretty sure I have), go read it. Some of what Butler says is what Levi echoed in a recent posting contemplating the...
Read more

The trans athlete ban: Part 3a: NCAA hypocrisy

 [this is cross-posted with Title IX Blog where I will also post something about the announcement that NIL is not subject to Title IX] The NCAA's new policy banning transwomen from competing in women's sports arrived (seemingly) minutes after the administration issued its executive order banning transwomen and girls from participating in school-sponsored sports teams.  The NCAA did include verbiage though which is worth looking at.  This is the synopsis at the top of the press release:  Men's category open to all eligible student-athletes, women's category restricted to student-athletes assigned female at birth, schools directed to foster welcoming environments on all campuses. But it is not accurate.  The women's category--for competition purposes--is open to people students assigned female at birth who are not taking testosterone. What we see here is a different standard. Testosterone levels matter only for some people. Taking it knocks you out of the women's...
Read more

The trans athlete ban, Part II: Capitulation

 The same day as the president signed the executive order banning transwomen in school-sponsored sports (which WILL have more widespread effects--i.e., recreational sports for youth and adults), the NCAA issued its own change on transwomen in collegiate sports which, for the purpose of "consistency" will also prohibit transwomen from competing in women's NCAA sports.  [I wrote about the effects the EO will have on Title IX compliance which is something that NCAA purports to care about, at Title IX Blog .] I would have been surprised (in a good way), if they had not. They give in to outside pressure regularly (with positive and negatives effects). But this policy is another example of their failure to protect athletes. [Lack of penalties for schools that shield predatory coaches and doctors as well as athletes who commit sexual assault; their exploitation of Black men who help them make their billions every March; their laughable adherence to an ahistorical definition of ...
Read more